Code of Civil Procedure 872.810 CCP – Division in Accordance with Interests (Manner of Partition)

//

California Code of Civil Procedure 872.810 is the California partition statute that provides for the manner of partition to be the manner set forth in the interlocutory judgment of partition, i.e., partition in kind vs. partition by sale. The statute provides that:

The court shall order that the property be divided among the parties in accordance with their interests in the property as determined in the interlocutory judgment.[1]California Code of Civil Procedure 872.810

General Preference for Partition in Kind

“Section 872.810 continues the preference of prior law for partition by division in kind. “[2]1976 Law Revision Commission Comment to California Code of Civil Procedure 872.810 “Partition in kind is favored in law and in the absence of proof to the contrary the presumption in favor of in kind division will prevail.”[3]Butte Creek Island Ranch v. Crim (1982) 136 Cal.App. 3d 360, 365

Exception Swallows the Rule: Single-Family Homes Will Almost Always Result in Partition by Sale

However, Section 872.810 must be read in connection with Section 872.820(b), which provides that:

Notwithstanding Section 872.810, the court shall order that the property be sold and the proceeds be divided among the parties in accordance with their interests in the property as determined in the interlocutory judgment in the following situations:…The court determines that, under the circumstances, sale and division of the proceeds would be more equitable than division of the property. For the purpose of making the determination, the court may appoint a referee and take into account his report.[4]California Code of Civil Procedure 872.820(b)

As a practical matter, this exception for partition by sale in 872.820(b) swallows the general preference for partition in kind in 872.810 for most partitions. This is because it is “more equitable” to sell the single-family homes that form the property in most partitions since division of such a house into two parcels of equal value is usually not possible. As one secondary source explains, a “sale may be more equitable if, for example, the value of the whole would exceed that of the divided parcels, or zoning restrictions make physical division impracticable.”[5]Determination of Manner of Partition., 12 Witkin, Summary 11th Real Prop (2020) § 73

One court explained this reality that most properties are partition by sale as follows: “In many modern transactions, sale of the property is preferable to physical division since the value of the divided parcels frequently will not equal the value of the whole parcel before division. Moreover, physical division may be impossible due to zoning restrictions or may be highly impractical.”[6]Butte Creek Island Ranch v. Crim (1982) 136 Cal. App. 3d 360, 366–67; accord Cummings v. Dessel (2017) 13 Cal. App. 5th 589, 597

A rare exception would be a single-family home located on a parcel with a significant portion of land with value equal to the house, e.g., a farm house. Another rare exception might be when there are two homes on a lot. However, generally, this element of the manner of partition for an interlocutory judgment is almost always met as a matter of law for single-family homes.[7]California Code of Civil Procedure 872.720

Contact an Experienced Partition Attorney in California

If you want to end your co-ownership relationship, but your co-owner won’t agree, a partition action is your only option. Our experienced partition lawyers have years of experience ending co-ownership disputes and can help you unlock the equity in your property. For a free, 15 minute consultation with an experienced partition attorney at Talkov Law, call (844) 482-5568 or fill out a contact form online.

  • What is an Answer to a Partition Action?What is an Answer to a Partition Action?
    Answer to a Partition Action Complaint in California When an action for partition is filed, the opposing party has an opportunity to respond to this action by filing an answer. An answer to a partition action is a pleading by…
  • Civil Code § 683.2(c) – Joint Tenancy Severance After Death is Limited by California LawCivil Code § 683.2(c) – Joint Tenancy Severance After Death is Limited by California Law
    By definition, a joint tenancy is an interest in property in which each party has an equal share in the property. Joint tenants also enjoy the privilege of the right of survivorship, which allows a deceased joint tenant’s interest in…
  • The Ultimate Glossary of Partition Action TermsThe Ultimate Glossary of Partition Action Terms
    A partition action is the only court-ordered process to separate joint owners’ respective interests in California real estate. This process can be long, tedious, and difficult, but the attorneys at Talkov Law are here to help. They have provided this…
  • Co-Owner’s Rights to Lease and Evict TenantsCo-Owner’s Rights to Lease and Evict Tenants
    A common issue with co-ownership is how to manage rented property. Notably, many times only one of the co-owners allows a third party to lease the co-owned property without the consent or over the objection of the other co-owners. As…
  • What is an Ouster?What is an Ouster?
    Co-ownership of property can raise many questions about the rights of each owner to the common property. Conversely, that co-ownership relationship can sour, causing one co-owner to seek the benefits of sole ownership- the right to exclude others- without the…
  • How to Win a Partition ActionHow to Win a Partition Action
    The Tricks to Winning a Partition Action in California A partition action is the only court process in California to end disputes when parties are co-owners (also known as co-tenants) of real property. Indeed, the court must divide the real…
  • Absolute Right to Partition in CaliforniaAbsolute Right to Partition in California
    One of the most common questions raised by co-owners of real property in California is how to force the sale of the property when the co-owners do not agree. California Code of Civil Procedure Section 872.210 allows a co-owner to…
  • If I Leave the Property, Do I Forfeit Co-Ownership Rights?If I Leave the Property, Do I Forfeit Co-Ownership Rights?
    As partition attorneys, property co-owners frequently ask if ownership rights can be forfeited by a co-owner moving out of (“abandoning”) the property. More specifically, co-owners want to know if they would give up their ownership rights to a co-owned property…

References

References
1 California Code of Civil Procedure 872.810
2 1976 Law Revision Commission Comment to California Code of Civil Procedure 872.810
3 Butte Creek Island Ranch v. Crim (1982) 136 Cal.App. 3d 360, 365
4 California Code of Civil Procedure 872.820(b)
5 Determination of Manner of Partition., 12 Witkin, Summary 11th Real Prop (2020) § 73
6 Butte Creek Island Ranch v. Crim (1982) 136 Cal. App. 3d 360, 366–67; accord Cummings v. Dessel (2017) 13 Cal. App. 5th 589, 597
7 California Code of Civil Procedure 872.720
About Talkov Law

The attorneys at Talkov Law practice real estate law, family law, business law, bankruptcy law, and trust & probate law. Our experienced lawyers specialize in assisting all parties involved in these civil disputes by providing the best legal representation.

Contact us to schedule your complimentary consultation.

Super Lawyers
US News and World Report Scott Talkov
Scott Talkov Three Best Rated 2021

Recent Blog Posts